Validating Panel RBS Antenna with Dipole Radiators against IEC 62232

This article validates AN-SOF’s results against the IEC FDIS 62232 standard by replicating an RBS panel antenna model with nine dipole radiators. The successful validation highlights AN-SOF’s ability to deliver highly accurate results, even with relatively simple models.

The IEC FDIS 62232 is a standard published by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) that provides methods for determining radio-frequency field strength and specific absorption rate (SAR) in the vicinity of radiocommunication base stations (RBS) for the purpose of evaluating human exposure.

This article validates the results obtained from AN-SOF by replicating a panel antenna model with nine dipole radiators. The model used for validation was published by the IEC and an excerpt of the document can be accessed by following this link. The antenna operates at 900 MHz, and each dipole is fed by a source with an amplitude that varies depending on the position of the dipole in the array. The total power delivered by the sources is 80 W, and this input power can be entered in AN-SOF in the Setup tab under the Excitation panel (see Fig. 1).

The near electric and magnetic fields of the antenna are calculated along three different lines, as shown in Figure 2 from the IEC document. To calculate the fields along these lines, the coordinates of the points have been entered in the Near-Field panel in AN-SOF, as illustrated in Figure 3.

The IEC document provides the power density along these three lines, and it has been established that a simulation package passes validation if the maximum deviation from the reference results is less than 10%.

As all the dipoles in the panel are oriented vertically, the radiated field will have a vertical polarization. Therefore, the reflector panel has been modeled in AN-SOF using a series of closely spaced vertical wires, as illustrated in Figure 4. To achieve the best fit with the published data, 31 wires have been used, divided into 70 segments each, and with a radius of 0.1 mm.

The symmetry of the dipole array allows us to infer that the near electric field will consist of two components, E_x and E_z, while the near magnetic field will only have the H_y component. The complex power density is obtained through the vector product S = E x H* (rms values). Therefore, S will have two components, S_x = -E_z H_y* and S_z = E_x H_y*. The time average of S = |S| is the observable power density, i.e. S² = |S_x|² + |S_z|² = (|E_x|² + |E_z|²) |H_y|². Consequently, S = |E_tot| |H_tot|. AN-SOF calculates the rms values of the total fields, |E_tot| and |H_tot|. To obtain the power density, it is simply a matter of multiplying these two values together.

The following tables and figures present a comparison between the results obtained from AN-SOF and those published by the IEC.

It should be noted that for all three lines, a deviation of less than 10% was obtained. Notably, lines 1 and 2 exhibit a remarkable fit to the published values. In the case of line 3, it is understandable that a greater deviation was observed due to its closer proximity to the panel.

X	Y	Z	E-total	H-total	AN-SOF	IEC	Diff.
m	m	m	V/m	A/m	W/m²	W/m²	%
0.5	0	0	155.074	0.412729	64.00	65.8	-2.7%
1	0	0	119.666	0.325305	38.93	39.4	-1.2%
1.5	0	0	94.964	0.254813	24.20	25	-3.2%
2	0	0	70.7595	0.184971	13.09	13.4	-2.3%
2.5	0	0	63.6891	0.167708	10.68	10.7	-0.2%
3	0	0	62.4638	0.165975	10.37	10.4	-0.3%
3.5	0	0	61.2374	0.163288	10.00	10.1	-1.0%
4	0	0	59.1723	0.157916	9.34	9.44	-1.0%

X	Y	Z	E-total	H-total	AN-SOF	IEC	Diff.
m	m	m	V/m	A/m	W/m²	W/m²	%
1	-1.4	0	48.8217	0.129096	6.30	6.22	1.3%
1	-1.2	0	58.5661	0.156657	9.17	9.16	0.2%
1	-1	0	70.4692	0.1908	13.45	13.6	-1.1%
1	-0.8	0	83.6555	0.228627	19.13	19.6	-2.4%
1	-0.6	0	96.8014	0.265566	25.71	26.3	-2.3%
1	-0.4	0	108.374	0.296696	32.15	32.8	-2.0%
1	-0.2	0	116.617	0.317764	37.06	37.6	-1.4%
1	0	0	119.666	0.325305	38.93	39.4	-1.2%
1	0.2	0	116.617	0.317764	37.06	37.6	-1.4%
1	0.4	0	108.374	0.296696	32.15	32.8	-2.0%
1	0.6	0	96.8014	0.265566	25.71	26.3	-2.3%
1	0.8	0	83.6555	0.228627	19.13	19.6	-2.4%
1	1	0	70.4692	0.1908	13.45	13.6	-1.1%
1	1.2	0	58.5661	0.156657	9.17	9.16	0.2%
1	1.4	0	48.8217	0.129096	6.30	6.22	1.3%

X	Y	Z	E-total	H-total	AN-SOF	IEC	Diff.
m	m	m	V/m	A/m	W/m²	W/m²	%
0.1	0	-1.4	9.96564	0.017827	0.18	0.173	2.7%
0.1	0	-1.2	48.9676	0.084127	4.12	3.77	9.3%
0.1	0	-1	197.953	0.592068	117.20	129	-9.1%
0.1	0	-0.8	201.218	0.532155	107.08	105	2.0%
0.1	0	-0.6	225.774	0.535084	120.81	111	8.8%
0.1	0	-0.4	268.064	0.634264	170.02	163	4.3%
0.1	0	-0.2	318.386	0.855277	272.31	272	0.1%
0.1	0	0	337.213	0.944083	318.36	338	-5.8%
0.1	0	0.2	318.386	0.855277	272.31	272	0.1%
0.1	0	0.4	268.064	0.634264	170.02	163	4.3%
0.1	0	0.6	225.774	0.535084	120.81	111	8.8%
0.1	0	0.8	201.218	0.532155	107.08	105	2.0%
0.1	0	1	197.953	0.592068	117.20	129	-9.1%
0.1	0	1.2	48.9676	0.084127	4.12	3.77	9.3%
0.1	0	1.4	9.96564	0.017827	0.18	0.173	2.7%

Conclusion:
This successful validation against the IEC 62232 standard demonstrates AN-SOF’s capability to deliver highly accurate results, even with a relatively simple model. It underscores the software’s reliability and precision in meeting international standards.

Golden Engineering