How Can We Help?
Search for answers or browse our Knowledge Base.
Guides | Models | Validation | Blog
-
Guides
-
-
- Modeling Common-Mode Currents in Coaxial Cables: A Hybrid Approach
- Evaluating EMF Compliance - Part 2: Using Near-Field Calculations to Determine Exclusion Zones
- Beyond Analytical Formulas: Accurate Coil Inductance Calculation with AN-SOF
- Complete Workflow: Modeling, Feeding, and Tuning a 20m Band Dipole Antenna
- DIY Helix High Gain Directional Antenna: From Simulation to 3D Printing
- Evaluating EMF Compliance - Part 1: A Guide to Far-Field RF Exposure Assessments
- Design Guidelines for Skeleton Slot Antennas: A Simulation-Driven Approach
- Simplified Modeling for Microstrip Antennas on Ungrounded Dielectric Substrates: Accuracy Meets Simplicity
- Fast Modeling of a Monopole Supported by a Broadcast Tower
- Linking Log-Periodic Antenna Elements Using Transmission Lines
- Wave Matching Coefficient: Defining the Practical Near-Far Field Boundary
- AN-SOF Mastery: Adding Elevated Radials Quickly
- Enhancing Antenna Design Flexibility: Project Merging in AN-SOF
- An Efficient Approach to Simulating Radiating Towers for Broadcasting Applications
- RF Techniques: Implicit Modeling and Equivalent Circuits for Baluns
- AN-SOF Antenna Simulation Best Practices: Checking and Correcting Model Errors
- Show All Articles (1) Collapse Articles
-
-
- To Our Valued AN-SOF Customers and Users: Reflections, Milestones, and Future Plans
- AN-SOF 9.50 Release: Streamlining Polarization, Geometry, and EMF Calculations
- AN-SOF 9: Taking Antenna Design Further with New Feeder and Tuner Calculators
- AN-SOF Antenna Simulation Software - Version 8.90 Release Notes
- AN-SOF 8.70: Enhancing Your Antenna Design Journey
- Introducing AN-SOF 8.50: Enhanced Antenna Design & Simulation Software
- Get Ready for the Next Level of Antenna Design: AN-SOF 8.50 is Coming Soon!
- Explore the Cutting-Edge World of AN-SOF Antenna Simulation Software!
- Upgrade to AN-SOF 8.20 - Unleash Your Potential
- AN-SOF 8: Elevating Antenna Simulation to the Next Level
- New Release: AN-SOF 7.90
- AN-SOF 7.80 is ready!
- New AN-SOF User Guide
- New Release: AN-SOF 7.50
- AN-SOF 7.20 is ready!
- New Release :: AN-SOF 7.10 ::
- AN-SOF 7.0 is Here!
- New Release :: AN-SOF 6.40 ::
- New Release :: AN-SOF 6.20 ::
- Show All Articles (4) Collapse Articles
-
-
- Types of Wires
- Wire Attributes
- Wire Materials
- Enabling/Disabling Resistivity
- Enabling/Disabling Coating
- Cross-Section Equivalent Radius
- Exporting Wires
-
-
Models
-
- Download Examples
- Explore 5 Antenna Models with Less Than 50 Segments in AN-SOF Trial Version
- Modeling a Center-Fed Cylindrical Antenna with AN-SOF
- Modeling a Circular Loop Antenna in AN-SOF: A Step-by-Step Guide
- Monopole Antennas Over Imperfect Ground: Modeling and Analysis with AN-SOF
- Helix Antenna in Axial Mode
- Yagi-Uda Array
- A Transmission Line
- An RLC Circuit
-
- Modeling a Super J-Pole: A Look Inside a 5-Element Collinear Antenna
- Simulating a Multiband Omnidirectional Dipole Antenna Design
- The Loop on Ground (LoG) Antenna: A Compact Solution for Directional Reception
- Precision Simulations with AN-SOF for Magnetic Loop Antennas
- Advantages of AN-SOF for Simulating 433 MHz Spring Helical Antennas for ISM & LoRa Applications
- Radio Mast Above Wire Screen
- Square Loop Antenna
- Receiving Loop Antenna
- Monopole Above Earth Ground
- Top-Loaded Short Monopole
- Half-Wave Dipole
- Folded Dipole
- Dipole Antenna
- The 5-in-1 J-Pole Antenna Solution for Multiband Communications
-
- Exploring an HF Log-Periodic Sawtooth Array: Insights from Geometry to Simulation
- The Lazy-H Antenna: A 10-Meter Band Design Guide
- Extended Double Zepp (EDZ): A Phased Array Solution for Directional Antenna Applications
- Transmission Line Feeding in Antenna Design: Exploring the Four-Square Array
- Enhancing VHF Performance: The Dual Reflector Moxon Antenna for 145 MHz
- Building a Compact High-Performance UHF Array with AN-SOF: A 4-Element Biquad Design
- Building a Beam: Modeling a 5-Element 2m Band Quad Array
- A Closer Look at the HF Skeleton Slot Antenna
- The 17m Band 2-Element Delta Loop Beam: A Compact, High-Gain Antenna for DX Enthusiasts
- The Moxon-Yagi Dual-Band VHF/UHF Antenna for Superior Satellite Link Performance
- Broadside Dipole Array
- Log-Periodic Dipole Array
- Broadband Directional Antenna
- Log-Periodic Christmas Tree
-
-
Validation
-
- Simple Dual Band Vertical Dipole for the 2m and 70cm Bands
- Linear Antenna Theory: Historical Approximations and Numerical Validation
- Validation of a Panel RBS Antenna with Dipole Radiators against IEC 62232 Standard
- Validating V Antennas: Directivity Analysis with AN-SOF
- Enhanced Methodology for Monopoles Above Radial Wire Ground Screens
- Dipole Gain and Radiation Resistance
- Convergence of the Dipole Input Impedance
- Validating Dipole Antenna Simulations: A Comparative Study with King-Middleton
Print
Power Budget
Created OnOctober 13, 2022
Updated OnFebruary 19, 2025
By:Tony Golden
To access the Power Budget dialog box (see Fig. 1), navigate to Results > Power Budget/RCS in the main menu. When discrete sources are used for excitation, the following list of parameters versus frequency is displayed:
Parameters
- Input Power: Total input power provided by the discrete sources in the structure.
- Radiated Power: Total radiated power from the structure.
- Structure Loss: Total consumed power, representing ohmic losses in the structure.
- Efficiency: Radiated power-to-input power ratio, representing the radiation efficiency. For a lossless structure, this value is 100%.
- Directivity: Peak directivity, displayed both as a dimensionless value and in decibels (dBi) relative to an isotropic source.
- Gain: Peak gain, displayed both as a dimensionless value and in decibels (dBi) relative to an isotropic source.
- Av. EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power): Time-averaged EIRP in Watts and dBW. This value accounts for the duty cycle of the selected transmit mode in the Tuner tab and the Time Transmitting percentage.
- Peak EIRP (Effective Isotropic Radiated Power): Peak EIRP in Watts and dBW, calculated directly from the Peak Envelope Power (PEP) without considering the duty cycle or time transmitting percentage.
- Av. Power Density: Average power density, calculated by averaging the power density over all directions in space.
- Peak Power Density: Maximum value of the radiated power density.
- Theta (max) and Phi (max): The zenith and azimuth angles, respectively, in the direction of maximum radiation, corresponding to the peak power density.
- F/R H and F/B H: Front-to-rear and front-to-back ratios, respectively, in a horizontal slice of the radiation pattern given by Theta = Theta (max).
- F/R V and F/B V: Front-to-rear and front-to-back ratios, respectively, in a vertical slice of the radiation pattern given by Phi = Phi (max).
Error and Average Gain Test (AGT)
- Error: Represents the error in the power balance of the system. A necessary (but not sufficient) condition for a valid model is that the input power must equal the sum of the radiated and lost powers. The error is calculated as:
$\displaystyle \text{Error %} = 100 \times \frac{\text{Input Power} \,-\, \text{Lost Power} \,-\, \text{Radiated Power}}{\text{Input Power} \,-\, \text{Lost Power}}$
- Average Gain Test (AGT): A validation metric that should be close to 1 for a valid model. It is calculated as:
$\displaystyle \text{AGT} = \frac{\text{Radiated Power} + \text{Lost Power}}{\text{Input Power}}$
Plotting and Exporting Data
- Select an item from the list in the upper-right corner of the window and click the Plot button to plot the selected item versus frequency.
- Click the Export button to export the list to a CSV file.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67032/670325b1714cb8e90644d15d10c84cf45769eda5" alt=""
Notes
- A power budget error of about ±10% is permissible from the engineering point of view.
- When a real ground plane is used, the Error column shows the percentage of power lost in the ground due to its finite conductivity.
- When a substrate slab is used, this column shows the percentage of power transferred to the dielectric material in the substrate.
- AGT = 1 means that the power balance is exact. An AGT between 0.99 and 1.01 is comparable to achieving an error of ±1%.
Table of Contents